<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trends v. Fundamentals in Nonprofit Funding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forimpact.org/2008/11/trends_v_fundamentals.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forimpact.org/2008/11/trends_v_fundamentals.php</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:19:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Hodge</title>
		<link>http://www.forimpact.org/2008/11/trends_v_fundamentals.php/comment-page-1#comment-82692</link>
		<dc:creator>James Hodge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 11:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forimpact.org/?p=1216#comment-82692</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments on trends, fads and foundamentals.

Couldn&#039;t agree with you more about the need to enhance fundamentals...there is also a need to identify best practices of those fundamentals outside of our selective niches in philanthropy.

Couldn&#039;t agree with you less about what you define as fads.  There is a difference between new practices or models and fads.  the last time I checked fundraisng walks and social enterprise and social media were climbing not trending down.  At nearly sixty years of age and a technopeasant, I am still willing to bet social media will be with us for a very long time.  Just because an organization poorly executes in new models and does not focus on fundamentals doesn&#039;t mean the models are fads...it eans the execution is flawed.  Not sure if I have articulated that to my liking?

I think leadership in our work needs fundamentals (best thinking in the box) and novel, evidence-based thinking about innovation in our work...thinking outside the box. Your fad becomes my fundamental.

The next level of our work I thnk will be a creative merging of philanthropy-social enterprise-business sectors along with a general &quot;trend&quot; to collaborative sector blending and sector bending initiatives rather than a competitive scarcity model approach. We just have to find the bright spots in these &#039;fads&#039;, develop best practices and constantly, as you say, revisit the purpose in our work.

Have a feeling we are very close in our mutal thinking...but these are merely early morning musings towards the dialogue.

Best regards.

Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments on trends, fads and foundamentals.</p>
<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree with you more about the need to enhance fundamentals&#8230;there is also a need to identify best practices of those fundamentals outside of our selective niches in philanthropy.</p>
<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree with you less about what you define as fads.  There is a difference between new practices or models and fads.  the last time I checked fundraisng walks and social enterprise and social media were climbing not trending down.  At nearly sixty years of age and a technopeasant, I am still willing to bet social media will be with us for a very long time.  Just because an organization poorly executes in new models and does not focus on fundamentals doesn&#8217;t mean the models are fads&#8230;it eans the execution is flawed.  Not sure if I have articulated that to my liking?</p>
<p>I think leadership in our work needs fundamentals (best thinking in the box) and novel, evidence-based thinking about innovation in our work&#8230;thinking outside the box. Your fad becomes my fundamental.</p>
<p>The next level of our work I thnk will be a creative merging of philanthropy-social enterprise-business sectors along with a general &#8220;trend&#8221; to collaborative sector blending and sector bending initiatives rather than a competitive scarcity model approach. We just have to find the bright spots in these &#8216;fads&#8217;, develop best practices and constantly, as you say, revisit the purpose in our work.</p>
<p>Have a feeling we are very close in our mutal thinking&#8230;but these are merely early morning musings towards the dialogue.</p>
<p>Best regards.</p>
<p>Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theresa</title>
		<link>http://www.forimpact.org/2008/11/trends_v_fundamentals.php/comment-page-1#comment-13388</link>
		<dc:creator>Theresa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 01:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forimpact.org/?p=1216#comment-13388</guid>
		<description>The organization is a start up and we are seeking funding 501c3 company contact person is  Ms Hamilton ( 281)300-0667</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The organization is a start up and we are seeking funding 501c3 company contact person is  Ms Hamilton ( 281)300-0667</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


<meta name="google-site-verification" content="tgeG1pDGbUmbN5hQMbPVw8fez1avYlxwBHyNNipyE44" />
